William Gairdner’s The Trouble with Canada…Still

The Rank Immorality of the Welfare State

     In print less than two years after his splendid Book of Absolutes, William Gairdner’s The Trouble with Canada…Still is his twelfth major work to date, and promises to be yet another bestseller.  In a country whose inhabitants are so contentedly in thrall to the “Swedish model” that they suffer both figuratively and literally from the Stockholm syndrome, Gairdner’s is no mean feat.  He achieves it, moreover, while writing serious books:  historically and philosophically erudite, meticulously researched, and rather heftier than the cuisine minceur publishers typically serve up these days, with their eyes fixed on the bottom line.

As the adverb in the title indicates, Gairdner’s current book is a revised and completely updated sequel to his original Trouble with Canada (1990).  In the intervening two decades, so many of his earlier admonitions about the tumescent growth of Canada’s political class and the correlative diminishment of her civil discourse and moral character have been reified, that one could hardly blame him if he were presently in the throes of a full-blown Cassandra-complex.  But Gairdner’s optimism and good humour leaven every page, even as his wistful recollections of Canada’s erstwhile traditions of liberty and personal responsibility—his patriotism, in the best sense of the word–fill one with the kind of nostalgia that Cato must have felt.

Twenty years after the fall of International Communism one might assume that the socialist idea would have been fatally discredited by now.  And yet every modern Western democracy is a suffocating Welfare State.  In their Circean enchantment with “social justice”, Canadians in particular have been afflicted by historical amnesia, oblivious, as Gairdner points out, to Canada’s roots in the British traditions of liberty and limited government, and the noxious experience with State tyranny out of which modern democratic ideas first arose.  Canadians even smugly proclaim the Welfare State as a defining national value and founding institution, unaware that, in fact, it’s a rib torn from the Great Society of cut-throat-capitalist Amerika.


Replete with such ironies, Gairdner’s book is the sort of historical and ideological primer that ought to be required reading for Canadian voters.  Gairdner shows that ideologies are hardly the arbitrary constructions that so many sophisticated “third-way” Canadian intellectuals pretend, but are complexes of ideas with a necessary and organic consistency.  They can’t be “mixed”; the two principal political philosophies–one of universal human freedoms, self-reliance, and equality before the law (modern-day conservatism), the other of victimological grievance, identity-group “rights”, special entitlements, and State-engineered equality of outcome (modern-day liberalism)–, are mutually antagonistic and can only thrive at each other’s expense.  Social conservatives take note:  the Welfare State’s assault on sexual continence, marriage, the family, the Church (and the freedom to raise children and live in accordance with such traditional moral norms and institutions) is of a piece with everything else It does.  Equalizing income (by tearing down the rich) and equalizing lifestyles (by tearing down “exclusionary” socio-moral barriers and distinctions—as in gay “marriage”) are two sides of the same debased coin.

Equality is, of course, the State’s charitable bequest to its citizens.  But as Gairdner shows, it is an ontological and ethical monstrosity, which can only be created by Procrustean mutilations of human nature.  No society that eschews force and respects freedom and justice has ever been “equal”, inasmuch as human beings have never been equal.  Natural differences in intelligence, gender, talent, ingenuity, and effort can only be equalized by treating citizens inequitably:   handicapping those who excel by dint of ability or enterprise while rewarding mediocrity or sloth; whereby we will naturally get less of the former and more of the latter.  As it happens, incomes in socialist economies are no less unequal than in capitalist ones, while their disparities extend across a more beggarly range of human misery.

With none of the sanctimony displayed by the enemies of free market capitalism, Gairdner demonstrates how fundamentally immoral is the redistributionist ethos.  Since the State neither produces nor possesses any wealth of its own, what it “gives” to some, it must confiscate from others.  (Canadians either don’t understand this, or their consciences have been narcotized by their own idleness and greed.)  Our moral “right” to this or that government service or benefit is a right to pauperize someone else.  And “rights” breed like rabbits these days; private desires gestate into public needs and then into universal entitlements in the time it takes for a politician to calculate the number of votes in the new cohort of desiderants.

In the Welfare State, as Gairdner notes, the envy that often lurks behind the beneficent smile of egalitarianism has become pandemic, since “soaking the rich” means “soaking each other to pay each other” (76% of social spending currently goes to middle- and higher-income Canadians).   “Everyone”, as Gairdner observes, “tries to live at the expense of everyone else” (with government skimming off a healthy commission for its ersatz generosity with taxpayers’ money).  It’s a state of mutual depredation and enslavement:  Hobbes’ state of nature masquerading as a community of Good Samaritans.

It puzzles Gairdner (as me) that corporations and businessmen are reflexively accused of avarice, while those grasping constituencies that demand more and more of the former’s profits, and the sticky-fingered State middle-men who get rich in the transference process, are assumed to have been born without the taint of original sin.  Gargantuan government debt (payable by unborn taxpayers) may yet make the Welfare State unsustainable, but until then it seems guaranteed, by democracy itself, to grow.  We have already reached the Swedish threshold at which two thirds of Canada’s citizens are directly or indirectly employed by, or net-recipients of the largesse of, the nanny State, with the other third producing the wealth that pays their wages and benefits.  (“Exploitation”, anyone?)  A “democratic” majority living off the labour of a minority helot-class of entrepreneurs is not likely to vote to change things soon.  Not surprisingly, as Gairdner points out, there isn’t a single democracy in the Western world whose government hasn’t grown exponentially (while individual freedom and self-reliance have correlatively diminished) since the early twentieth century.


Reinventing Civilization, Democratically

     For seventy-odd years, by means of relentless propaganda (backed up by the constant threat of imprisonment), the Communist State asserted itself to discredit and repeal all traditional moral norms and social arrangements (the family, the Church, the marketplace, etc.), which it deemed to be in deadly competition with itself for the loyalty of its subjects, and an impediment to its progressive agenda for reinventing the wheel of civilization.  By gentler and subtler methods, to be sure, the modern democratic Welfare State, as Gairdner demonstrates, has belatedly accomplished what the likes of Mao and Pol Pot could only have dreamed of.

     Under its self-appointed mandate to redress every imaginable inequity and misfortune (including those we have brought upon ourselves), Canada’s political class has sired a pullulant brood of “rights” (to universal daycare; in vitro parenthood; the right of gays to marry; transgender bathroom rights; the right not to be offended; the right of the obese to wider airline seats, or the best spaces in their condo parking lots).  In the reasoning of the Canadian government, if an elephant should desire to pass through the eye of a needle, it is his Charter right to do so; whereby needle manufacturers must be required to make bigger needles.

     Having conferred them upon a grateful citizenry, the State, of course, must enforce these neoteric “rights”.  In the Sixties, the New Left (including unrepentant apologists for Soviet totalitarianism) accused both Canada and the United States of being “police states”.  In Canada today, the same Axis of Progress has given us pay equity police, minimum wage police, affirmative action police, language police, thought and speech police on campus and in the media, human rights constabularies (with their voluntary citizen vigilantes of political correctness), and an official police force that ignores violent crime when it is committed before its gaze by victimologically privileged minorities (as at Caledon) or anti-capitalist thugs (the G-20).  

     In deference to this bounty of special entitlements, the tersely non-specific human rights that have been recognized as inalienable for centuries–private property, freedom of speech, association, and religion–are the first to be set aside by our legislatures, courts, and human rights tribunals.  By sacrificing on the altar of homosexual “equality” a Christian’s freedom to operate his business in accordance with his conscience, the State repeals all of the ancient liberties named above.  In lowering standards (under the rubric of “affirmative action”) in order to “discriminate for” certain groups, It necessarily discriminates against all others, violating the foundational principle of justice itself:  that we all play by the same rules of the game.  In the process, the State supplements marginal and episodic racial discrimination with racism and sexism that are government-mandated and universal in scope (“systemic”, as the racial hucksters like to call it).  If any doubt remains that It is tone-deaf to irony, the State now so vitiates our once sacred right of private property that homeowners and shopkeepers are sent to jail for trying to protect their possessions against thieves.


     The primary target of social reconstruction, as Gairdner notes, has been the traditional family, inasmuch as its superannuation makes it that much easier for the nanny State to capture the deracinated individual into Its infantilizing orbit.  As even liberals have acknowledged, generous welfare subsidies to single mothers reward casual, out-of-wedlock coitus, usurp the role of the father (freeing him to resume his sexual marauding with a clear conscience), render marriage redundant (indeed, once married, mothers forfeit government support), and create multi-generational dependency.  The de-stigmatization and legal recognition of common-law and, most recently, homosexual unions have revoked the ancient but apparently unmerited social privilege of traditional marriage.  As apostles of the modern orthodoxies of egalitarianism and relativism, the State strikes a pose of official neutrality toward all (“alternative”) lifestyles (while, at the same time, promoting the non-normative ones as vibrant blooms of diversity in Its Johnny-Has-Two-Mommies pedagogical propaganda).

With billions in funding for Leftist–but not a cent for pro-family–women’s organizations, the government of Canada has vigorously proselytized the credenda of radical feminism, especially its risible fable that men and women are innately the same, whereby disparities in wages are the result of misogynist prejudice, and differences in roles merely “socially constructed”.  (The radical feminist argument for abortion, meanwhile, is that it liberates women from an unequal biological burden; but then, if it serves the Sisterhood on occasion to acknowledge innate gender differences, why not?)

     Gairdner thoroughly debunks these shibboleths in his chapter on the subject.  He points out, more importantly, that when women are exhorted to “provide”, they are no longer available to “nurture”.  The natural contract of the traditional family is dissolved, to the obvious detriment of children in particular, and society in general, which soon inherits all of the resultant social pathologies.

      Gairdner also notes the propaganda potential of “universal daycare” (the very definition of the Welfare State, it seems to me), and its eerie similarity with totalitarian measures to remove children from the reactionary influences of mothers and fathers and give them new birth as pristine creations of the State (children of the “national family”).  But then our public schools, with their programs of sex education and condom distribution, and their “value-free” moral and cultural pedagogy, already do that.

     Which brings me to Gairdner’s chapter on multiculturalism and immigration (the means to obliterate at a stroke all of the ancient traditions and institutions of Canada’s civil society).  The democratic State can no longer deport its population to re-education camps, of course, but it can at least reconstitute it.  In Canada, the relativism that is the ideological taproot of official multiculturalism scoffs at claims of cultural superiority (even as, in the curricular propaganda of our government schools, it diabolizes our founding Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian heritage as a miasmal swamp of racism, sexism, and “hegemonism”).  Though the twentieth century ought to have taught us that ethnic tribalism is the most primitive and vicious of human instincts, it serves the State’s atomistic agenda splendidly.  And if multiculturalism should fail in depotentiating Canada’s native traditions, norms, and institutions, wholesale demographic replacement through third-world immigration may well provide a final solution.  Let’s call it ethnic cleansing by democratic means.

One thought on “William Gairdner’s The Trouble with Canada…Still

  1. Thank you again, Mr Price.

    Pleased to see William Gairdner is back and your review brought back the prophecies of this visionary man.

    I loved “victimologically privileged”. Of course, you are not including all professors, especially
    retired Christian professors on a state pension.

Comments are closed.